UPDATE! Scratch this request please ... because one must scroll the sorted list, it would be more beneficial to sort by strongest safety signal ... is that what your default is?
Lol I've been on it the past 30 minutes. Favor ... can you give me a direct link to PDR analysis (https://pervaers.com/?v=CI0) sorted by Name? for COVID19 and COVID19-2 preferred but if can only do one, COVID19
So as you can see, what I can offer today is only suited if you know how to handle the data, visualize it etc.
Anything else I will need time for. Do you need charts or just data?
Oh and very glad you like it. I always knew this would be a very niche thing, but I can guarantee you you won't find a complete list of safety of signals, stratified by age and gender, based on age adjusted data anywhere else.
You are right... Probably better. The problem is that nobody knows what proportional differences are. I haven't ever seen it used a single time. The CDC uses proportion ratios instead and not that many more people know what those are.
These charts are all diffences in proportion. Odds ratios should not be used at all for this type of data according to literature and proportion ratios don't really mean anything without putting them into context. If your risk to suffer an extremely rare adverse event is increased by a factor of 200 is not really relevant when the baseline rate is 1 in a billion.
Most approaches to VAERS are not very useful. The magnitude can be estimated from the proportions of different medical concepts relative to each other.
Btw here is a little secret: If you begin your query with an asterisk, you can search the parent category names as well (HLT, HLGT and I think even SOC).
EDIT: I used to call it "Differences in proportions" on the chart or proportional differences, but I thought excess proportions might ring a bell with some folks. Let me know if you have a better suggestion. It takes less than 60seconds to update the site to display different text on the charts. All charts are calculated on your pc, that's why they load so fast. All compressed to 1.5MB, 15k charts or so. 100 bytes per chart. This text I just wrote post takes up 17 times as much space as one chart. I know I know, not many people find this as exciting as I do. It's custom compression, because I bought the domain and webspace on a shoestring budget and figured the site would have to load fast. :D
I should work something out there. Thing is, I haven't gotten around to writing substack articles, because I am busy working on estimating population proportions age 12-17 and 18-64 from Census data by state and year... Really exciting... Gonna be worth it though I think!!
Default sorts by a mix of proportional difference and proportional ratio. Not sure how the two are weighted.
Proportional differences are really the only thing a patient or doctor should have any interest in. Proportional ratios are used for safety signal detection.
If I default sort by proportional difference only though, a lot of the highly product-specific signals will move further down in the list (menstrual issues, pulmonary embolisms etc.), so I figured using a mix for default sorting is ideal.
I can give you my entire database if you can handle it. But it will contain a lot of "empty" signals. There will also be a lot of signals that were filtered due to being too rare. I update it weekly if I can find the time.
You'll have RR, OR and DP for 22 age groups (more than on the website) and 2+1 genders, 66 groups in total.
There are also safety signals for all Higher Level Terms and all Higher Level Group Terms (and even SOC's I think) which I didn't add to the website since I do not have a MedDRA license.
It's about 12GB as a gzipped mongodb collection. That's the easiest way to inspect these I think.
I have a shortened version, but that one is a bit cryptic. If this stuff is useful to you, I could reduce the database to something that can be handled more easily, but I won't have time for that today.
So the question is whether or not you can handle the large mongodb archive.
Those charts are created client side though. The database will not include charts.
I just want these data to be of use to people. It took me months to get to this point, so if you think you can do something with this, I would be willing to invest a little extra time. However it depending on how much work it I might not get to it in the next few days.
Thank you for explaining. I am only interested in linking to at this time. I can tell it's taken a lot of work! Thank you.
I suppose that one thing that is confusing to me is it's not abundantly clear whether I'm looking at PRR or PRD. It sounds like the focus is on PRD, but then you mention sorting by a combination of both, and in the sort choices "proportion ratio" is listed. Perhaps each graph should be labeled with either PRR, PRD, or unadjusted count?
I'm fine to link to the default (so long as it's understood whether PRR or PDR is being shown) or alphabetically list, but I can't figure out the URL to list alphabetically.
It's all PRD. I should just write that onto the chart.
I will! Thank you for the advice. You can only sort by PRR, not display it. The data is not even on the server, I sort it all beforehand and only upload the indices. :)
I suppose this is how the strength of a safety signals is classically estimated. I am not sure, I never looked at pharmacovigilance data before these maniacs started telling us how we should all inject viral RNA every other month or so.
PRR's are just naked numbers, not percentages. If PRR is expressed as a percentage, it's be north of 100% for every safety signal, so you generally just write 20 instead of 2000% when specifying the PRR (that's about the strength of these menstrual issues signals which are the most underrepresented side effect in the entire database due to hesitancy to speak to doctors about it.)
EDIT: Oh by the way, the Delta(p) in the top left corner is supposed to express this as well, since I had to squeeze it all on there somehow.
Actually, if you could explain your default sorting of the PDR analysis (with pulmonary embolism listed first) that would be appreciated. This sort might be more useful than sorting alphabetically.
Absolutely. What is beyond crazy though is the fact only a small handful can be truly in on the plot. So that means there are many others, potentially thousands of others, who are just going along with this without any ties to the WEF or any other agenda. Somehow they're just not seeing the red flags and absence of any movement to act upon them.
They were never wrong, they were always lying.
Check out my safety signal site if you are interested in this type of stuff. It's for numbers nerds though.
https://pervaers.com
Lots of work and computation behind this!
UPDATE! Scratch this request please ... because one must scroll the sorted list, it would be more beneficial to sort by strongest safety signal ... is that what your default is?
Lol I've been on it the past 30 minutes. Favor ... can you give me a direct link to PDR analysis (https://pervaers.com/?v=CI0) sorted by Name? for COVID19 and COVID19-2 preferred but if can only do one, COVID19
So as you can see, what I can offer today is only suited if you know how to handle the data, visualize it etc.
Anything else I will need time for. Do you need charts or just data?
Oh and very glad you like it. I always knew this would be a very niche thing, but I can guarantee you you won't find a complete list of safety of signals, stratified by age and gender, based on age adjusted data anywhere else.
Here is the latest ... I am deciding to link directly using the name of the symptom. For example: https://pervaers.com/?v=COV&q=chest%20pain
However, it would be nice if in the title of each graph I knew if I was looking at PRR or PRD explicitly, probably spelt out best.
You are right... Probably better. The problem is that nobody knows what proportional differences are. I haven't ever seen it used a single time. The CDC uses proportion ratios instead and not that many more people know what those are.
These charts are all diffences in proportion. Odds ratios should not be used at all for this type of data according to literature and proportion ratios don't really mean anything without putting them into context. If your risk to suffer an extremely rare adverse event is increased by a factor of 200 is not really relevant when the baseline rate is 1 in a billion.
Most approaches to VAERS are not very useful. The magnitude can be estimated from the proportions of different medical concepts relative to each other.
Btw here is a little secret: If you begin your query with an asterisk, you can search the parent category names as well (HLT, HLGT and I think even SOC).
Examples:
https://www.pervaers.com/?v=CI0&q=*pregnan
https://www.pervaers.com/?v=C01&q=*coagula
https://www.pervaers.com/?v=C21&q=*coagula
https://www.pervaers.com/?v=C21&q=*nephro
https://www.pervaers.com/?v=C21&q=*heart_failures
https://www.pervaers.com/?v=C01&q=*Vascular_disorders
EDIT: I used to call it "Differences in proportions" on the chart or proportional differences, but I thought excess proportions might ring a bell with some folks. Let me know if you have a better suggestion. It takes less than 60seconds to update the site to display different text on the charts. All charts are calculated on your pc, that's why they load so fast. All compressed to 1.5MB, 15k charts or so. 100 bytes per chart. This text I just wrote post takes up 17 times as much space as one chart. I know I know, not many people find this as exciting as I do. It's custom compression, because I bought the domain and webspace on a shoestring budget and figured the site would have to load fast. :D
Right now I'm calling it Proportional Reporting Analysis and the title or subtitle of the graphs will explain better. I sent an email btw
I should work something out there. Thing is, I haven't gotten around to writing substack articles, because I am busy working on estimating population proportions age 12-17 and 18-64 from Census data by state and year... Really exciting... Gonna be worth it though I think!!
I can't find any email. Searched for your last name.
Proportional reporting analysis fits the bill pretty well, yes.
Default sorts by a mix of proportional difference and proportional ratio. Not sure how the two are weighted.
Proportional differences are really the only thing a patient or doctor should have any interest in. Proportional ratios are used for safety signal detection.
If I default sort by proportional difference only though, a lot of the highly product-specific signals will move further down in the list (menstrual issues, pulmonary embolisms etc.), so I figured using a mix for default sorting is ideal.
I can give you my entire database if you can handle it. But it will contain a lot of "empty" signals. There will also be a lot of signals that were filtered due to being too rare. I update it weekly if I can find the time.
You'll have RR, OR and DP for 22 age groups (more than on the website) and 2+1 genders, 66 groups in total.
There are also safety signals for all Higher Level Terms and all Higher Level Group Terms (and even SOC's I think) which I didn't add to the website since I do not have a MedDRA license.
It's about 12GB as a gzipped mongodb collection. That's the easiest way to inspect these I think.
I have a shortened version, but that one is a bit cryptic. If this stuff is useful to you, I could reduce the database to something that can be handled more easily, but I won't have time for that today.
So the question is whether or not you can handle the large mongodb archive.
Those charts are created client side though. The database will not include charts.
I just want these data to be of use to people. It took me months to get to this point, so if you think you can do something with this, I would be willing to invest a little extra time. However it depending on how much work it I might not get to it in the next few days.
Thank you for explaining. I am only interested in linking to at this time. I can tell it's taken a lot of work! Thank you.
I suppose that one thing that is confusing to me is it's not abundantly clear whether I'm looking at PRR or PRD. It sounds like the focus is on PRD, but then you mention sorting by a combination of both, and in the sort choices "proportion ratio" is listed. Perhaps each graph should be labeled with either PRR, PRD, or unadjusted count?
I'm fine to link to the default (so long as it's understood whether PRR or PDR is being shown) or alphabetically list, but I can't figure out the URL to list alphabetically.
It's all PRD. I should just write that onto the chart.
I will! Thank you for the advice. You can only sort by PRR, not display it. The data is not even on the server, I sort it all beforehand and only upload the indices. :)
I suppose this is how the strength of a safety signals is classically estimated. I am not sure, I never looked at pharmacovigilance data before these maniacs started telling us how we should all inject viral RNA every other month or so.
PRR's are just naked numbers, not percentages. If PRR is expressed as a percentage, it's be north of 100% for every safety signal, so you generally just write 20 instead of 2000% when specifying the PRR (that's about the strength of these menstrual issues signals which are the most underrepresented side effect in the entire database due to hesitancy to speak to doctors about it.)
EDIT: Oh by the way, the Delta(p) in the top left corner is supposed to express this as well, since I had to squeeze it all on there somehow.
Okay I updated the text. If it doesn't display, hit Ctrl+F5.
Actually, if you could explain your default sorting of the PDR analysis (with pulmonary embolism listed first) that would be appreciated. This sort might be more useful than sorting alphabetically.
It's always been about genocide and control.
Absolutely. What is beyond crazy though is the fact only a small handful can be truly in on the plot. So that means there are many others, potentially thousands of others, who are just going along with this without any ties to the WEF or any other agenda. Somehow they're just not seeing the red flags and absence of any movement to act upon them.
See the latest from bailiwicknews.substack.com NOW,
Also: https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/did-pfizer-perform-safety-testing