Discussion about this post

User's avatar
JJ's avatar

Exactly this has been available for anyone to see who wanted to look. Unfortunately too many only wanted to look at their TV screens.

Expand full comment
Copernicus's avatar

Everyone right now should be asking “then what the hell was ‘95% effective’ based on?” 95% effective at raising Fizer’s bottom line, apparently.

(And yes, I know the 95% was a relative risk reduction, not absolute.)

They already admitted months ago that the studies were not powered to detect differences in death.

😠

The problem, I think, is that the regular news aren’t reporting this. At least that’s what I suspect. I don’t watch regular news. THOSE are the ones who need to be hearing these admissions.

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts