The process for "Real world evidence"
Pay attention to this phrase, you'll be hearing much more of it, let alone participating in and funding it
(Originally written: January 19, 2022)
Parallel with changing the definition of "vaccine” the following article written by the Wellcome foundation explains — at a very high level — how the traditional vaccine development process has been hacked up to arrive at a COVID-19 "vaccine" faster.
Link to article: https://wellcome.org/news/quick-safe-covid-vaccine-development
“Wellcome is a politically and financially independent global charitable foundation, funded by a £38.2 billion investment portfolio.”
The tradition vaccine development process:
Compared to the fast-paced development process:
To summarize, humans are now the guinea pig and testing phases have been shorten or eliminated.
If long terms effects are not known (which it even says in the literature that comes with the experimental mRNA drugs), how can it be deemed "safe"?
For RNA viruses specifically, if there is always a lag time between a new variant and developing the next best concoction to attempt to minimize symptoms alone and not stop transmission, how is it "effective"?
The article says testing and safety measures haven't been cut back, but you be the judge, that is not how I see it.
I cannot understand how anyone in their right mind can recommend this to a low-risk, healthy individual with so many risks unknown and the research essentially hidden until most of us are not even around.
I am completely dumbfounded. The only explanation I see is the global elite are trying to push this research at "lightning speed" to arrive at answers to extend the length of THEIR lives and improve the quality of THEIR health, while coercing citizens to pay to be THEIR guinea pigs.
There I said it.
Certainly I'm not the only one thinking this.
I'm just fed up enough to say it.