“Real world evidence” paid by taxpayers - mandates attempt to eliminate a control group
In science, a good experiment requires both a control group and an experimental group. Without a control group, it is mad science. The process was rushed, and the mRNA technology is considered "new" because it had not yet succeeded in accomplishing its goals.
Just because technology is new or promising, does not necessitate its success. It merely means it is an experiment. I personally witnessed the CDC edit their tweet in October 2021 from "experimental" to "new". It is semantics. Read information on how the development and approval process was shortened, how AI is involved to estimate and predict protein structures, how proteins can change shape as they pass through the body, how lipid nanoparticles can pass through the blood-brain barrier, and decide for yourself.
Single protein synthesis only
With respect to synthesizing the spike protein alone (and not the entire virus comprised of nearly 30 proteins); this statement from https://www.forbes.com/sites/robtoews/2021/10/03/alphafold-is-the-most-important-achievement-in-ai-ever/ matters:
“With all this said, it is important to note that AlphaFold has meaningful limitations.
Its predictions are not always as accurate as more traditional experimental methods. It predicts one stable conformation per protein, but proteins are dynamic and may change shape as they move through the body. Edge cases—like intrinsically disordered proteins and unnatural amino acids—can trip AlphaFold up.
AlphaFold generates predictions about individual protein structures, but it sheds little light on multiprotein complexes, protein-DNA interactions, protein-small molecule interactions, and the like—dynamics that are essential to understand for many biomedical use cases.”
Consider that it is the thorn of the entire rose that inflicts pain alone. The literature says the long term effects are not known. This is why I choose not to grab a rose stem blindly with my eyes closed. As beautiful as it may seem, I may even choose by my own freewill not to accept the rose at all, as it is my choice.
Rushed approval process
There are more than 20,000 FDA-approved products. That does not mean I want any of them or that they are appropriate for everyone. A study from the Journal of the American Medical Association finds that nearly a third of FDA-approved drugs had problems: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/2625319/jama_Downing_2017_oi_170043.pdf
"Drugs used to treat mental illness and drugs that went through an accelerated approval process had a higher number of 'events,' the study found."
"On average, it takes about 12 years to get a drug from the research phase to patient. Only five in 5,000 drugs in preclinical testing make it to human trials, and only one in five is ever approved for human use."
“We are preventing this virus from entering into a stable 'endemic' relationship by the injection and its sub-optimal immune pressure, causing selection of competitively advantaged variants,” reiterates Dr. Paul Alexander.
In agreement, Geert Vanden Bossche, independent virologist and vaccine expert, formerly employed at GAVI and The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation writes in an open letter, “As stated, I am not against vaccination. On the contrary, I can assure you that each of the current vaccines have been designed, developed and manufactured by brilliant and competent scientists. However, this type of prophylactic vaccines are completely inappropriate, and even highly dangerous, when used in mass vaccination campaigns during a viral pandemic. Vaccinologists, scientists and clinicians are blinded by the positive short-term effects in individual patients, but don’t seem to bother about the disastrous consequences for global health.”
Lack of random sampling
At 38:00 minutes at a Tennessee State House Health Subcommittee meeting (https://tnga.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=610&clip_id=26334), Dr. Richard Urso explains, “natural immunity has always been superior to vaccinated immunity through all time” and that the studies of Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson all eliminated patients with natural immunity from their studies. Therefore, a random sample well-representative of the general population is not represented in their studies. So without this broad, random sample in clinical trials, and implementing this experiment in the “real world” for evidence, we can see the result. At 54:00 minutes of this same testimony, Dr. Urso states:
“This is the most dangerous vaccine rollout in our history.”
It has been called "investigational," "experimental," "new," "approved for emergency use". Whatever it's called, people should have the personal FREEDOM to CHOOSE.
Great synopsis. Also, scientists like Geert Vanden Bossche have pointed out that mass vaccination with a non-sterilizing vaccine for a mutating respiratory coronavirus can only lead to immune escape and more infectious variants.
Truth!1 Thank you.....“Don't ever let anyone put out your light because they are blinded by it.”
― Shannon L. Alder